Open and Closed Softwares

http://ezinearticles.com/?Differences-Between-Open,-Free,-and-Closed-Source-Software&id=1329290

For those unfamiliar with the concepts of open source software, you may be wondering what the differences are between open and closed source software. While the argument about which is better can become heated, knowing the differences between the two will help organizations to make the right decisions about the type of program that is best suited to your organization's needs.
Open Source
Open source software refers to a type of program that allows the source code of the software to be readily accessible to a variety of people. Under a license agreement, which often has very few restrictions, the source code can be used, modified, and redistributed within a group of people. While open source software was initially started in the 1980s, it has continually developed into an incredibly useful tool for individuals and companies alike.
The benefits include:
- Access to the source code
- Ability to find and fix any problems quickly
- Less vulnerable to hackers and viruses
Free Software
Although many people may confused open source with free software, there are several differences. Unlike the term open source, the word free simply means that something is given without any charge. Unlike open source, free software does not always allow developers to access the source code. This is the most important difference to understand between true open source and free software.
Free software is rarely as flexible and accessible as open source software, making it difficult for developers to utilize for the benefit of their organization.
Closed Source Software (Proprietary Software)
Proprietary software differs from open source software in that there are many more restrictions placed on the use, modification, and redistribution of the software. The proprietors often enforce these restrictions by the use of copyrights and patents, and also may restrict access to the source code. While propriety software is not the same as commercial software due to the ability to distribute propriety software without any cost, the two have many similarities.
An example of propriety software is best seen in companies like Microsoft. These proprietors often argue that the cost of their software allows for further development and research of the software. Propriety software does not allow the same type of flexibility as open software, so it is not often a good choice for many organizations.
To learn more about how open source software may be helpful to you or your organization, contact a leading provider of constituent relationship management software [http://www.mpoweropen.com/products.shtml] today.

Joseph Devine Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine